Free Christian web hosting


Easy Church Financing



In The Beginning
John Paul II Anti-Pope # 4
Anti-Pope Harlot John Paul II
False Rites, SSPX False Traditional Catholics
Dead Rites
Rome Harlot, The Whore Of Babylon
More Heresies John Paul Masonic Non-Catholic Zionist Manifest Heretic
Paul VI Anti-Christ, Anti-pope
John Paul Devil Dog Heretic
Pro-Life Closing


TransactU offers everything you need to accept online registrations, payment and donations with a credit card or online check in a secure, hosted environment.

OCC Recommends

- Christian Counseling Degree
- Buzz Sunday School
- Preteen Sunday School
- Grow stronger families
- Friendly Children's Church
- Church Chairs
- Team Building
- Church Chairs Review
- Top Search Ranking

Free Christian Book from Gospel for Asia

Free Christian Dating

Meet Christian Singles – No Fee’s Ever – 100% Free Christian Dating.

Group's Buzz-Sunday School Sweet & Simple

International Missionary Insurance

Career, Groups,
Short Term, Teams

Real Catholics Follow St. Peter Up To Pius XII
John Paul Devil Dog Heretic
John Paul prayed with heretics, gave eternal salvation to heretics, make pacts with heretics, defended heretics. He did all things with heretics, manifest, material or formaliter but that crap about fake traditionalists saying the false popes are still popes because they are not manifest or formal but materialiter amounts to the same truth that a heretic is still outside the catholic church. Council of Florence, Council of Trent. John Paul II is and always was a HERETIC! Devils make heretics as they formed an alliance with the anti-christs of Vatican II. Masonry is the religion of the devil as was John Paul being blessed by a devilette Hindu witch. He gave animist rights to satan worshippers. He was masonic in his actions and words so even if we cannot prove he was a member, his deeds convict him of freemasonry and his associations with them and all the enemies of the Roman Catholic Church.

[117] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 2, 1969, p. 12.
[118] L’Osservatore Romano, May 8, 1969, p. 3.
[119] L’Osservatore Romano, July 24, 1969, p. 12.
[120] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 5, 1971, p. 12.
[121] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 12, 1968, p. 1.
[122] L’Osservatore Romano, July 24, 1975, p. 2.
[123] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 7, 1976, p. 2.
[124] L’Osservatore Romano, July 6, 1978, p. 12.
[125] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 28, 1976, p. 4.
[126] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 16, 1976, p. 4.
[127] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 30, 1976, p. 1.
[128] L’Osservatore Romano, June 19, 1969, p. 6.
[129] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 25, 1969, p. 3.
[130] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 1, 1976, p. 11.
[131] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 30, 1976, p. 1.
[132] The Oxford Illustrated Dictionary, p. 425.
[133] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 30, 1976, p. 5.
[134] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 3, 1970, p. 6.
[135] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 25, 1969, p. 12.
[136] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 26, 1968, p. 1.
[137] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 24, 1972, p. 1.
[138] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 24, 1970, p. 2.
[139] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 3 (1903-1939), p. 6.
[140] Fr. Joaquin Arriaga, The New Montinian Church (410 W. Central Ave. Suite 101, Brea, CA.) pp.394-395.
[141] Piers Compton, The Broken Cross, Cranbrook, Western Australia: Veritas Pub. Co. Ptd Ltd, 1984, p. 72.
[142] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 3, 1970, p. 10.
[143] George Weigel, Witness to Hope, New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc., 1999, p.238.
[144] The Reign of Mary, Vol. XXVI, No. 81, p.17.
[145] Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 193.
[146]Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 193.
[147] Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 206.
[148] Nino Lo Bello, The Incredible Book of Vatican Facts and Papal Curiosities, Ligouri, MO., Liguori Pub. 1998. p. 195.
[149] The Reign of Mary, Vol. XXVIII, No. 90, p. 8.
6 George Weigel, Witness to Hope, p. 328.
[151] Piers Compton, The Broken Cross, p. 138.
[152] L’Osservatore Romano, July. 13, 1972, p. 6.
[153] Jean Guitton, “Nel segno dei Dodici,” interview by Maurizio Blondet, Avvenire, Oct. 11, 1992.
[154] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 19, 1968, p. 3.
[155] The Oxford Illustrated Dictionary, Second Edition, p. 512.
[156] L’Osservatore Romano, Nov. 23, 1972, p. 1.
[157] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 7, 1971, p. 1.
[158] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 26, 1974, p. 6.
[159] L’Osservatore Romano, May 22, 1975, p. 3.
[160] L’Osservatore Romano, May 18, 1969, p. 12.
[161] L’Osservatore Romano, March 9, 1972, p. 2.
[162] L'Osservatore Romano, July 12, 1973, p. 6.
[163] L'Osservatore Romano, Oct. 9, 1969, p. 1.
[164] Fr. Joaquin Arriaga, p. 391.

The Great Apostasy

I have re-edited certain portions of this page, you can go to vaticancatholic.com and get the full text on the Great Facade. I do not think you can give this book weight due to many problems that are not what the Catholic Church really is.

In the summer of 2002, the American Bishops in union with Antipope John Paul II issued a statement which declared that Jews should not be converted to Jesus Christ. In 1999, the Vatican and Antipope John Paul II agreed with the Lutherans that man is justified by faith alone and that the Council of Trent does not apply. Over the past 25 years, the Vatican, Antipope John Paul II and his bishops have repeatedly declared that the Eastern “Orthodox” (i.e., the Eastern Schismatics) should not be converted to the Catholic Church. The same bishops consistently teach that the Church of Jesus Christ is not the same thing as the Catholic Church; and every bishop in union with Antipope John Paul II denies the dogma outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation. The head of this Vatican II “Church” – the head of this Body of Apostasy – prays with the Jews for the coming of the Messiah, praises Martin Luther as a great spiritual leader and implores St. John the Baptist to protect Islam (a non-Christian religion).

To those of good will the meaning of all of this is easy to see: blatant apostasy, a new religion, an utter denial of the Gospel, unabashed and notorious heresy, a denial of the entire Catholic Faith. To others, however, it isn't even heresy at all. In this article, I will critique the false resistance.

The Outrageous Teaching on the Jews

As Catholics know, the heart of the Gospel involves the necessity of belief in Jesus Christ, the Son of God. This is the foundation of Christianity (along with the dogma of the Trinity), and is the subject of much of the four Gospels, especially St. John's Gospel. Here are just a few passages from St. John's Gospel concerning this primary dogma of the Catholic religion, the necessity of belief in Jesus Christ for salvation.

John 3:18: “... he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God.”

John 3:36: “He that believeth in the Son hath life everlasting: but he that believeth not the Son, shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him.”

John 8:23-24: “And he said to them [the Jews]: You are from beneath, I am from above. You are of this world, I am not of this world. Therefore, I said to you, that you shall die in your sins: for if you believe not that I am He, you shall die in your sin.”

John 10:1, 9: “Amen, Amen, I say to you: he that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up another way, the same is a thief and a robber... I am the door.”

John 14:6: Jesus saith to them: I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by me.

John 15:6: “If anyone abideth not in me, he shall be cast forth as a branch, and shall wither, and they shall gather him up, and cast him into the fire, and he burneth.”

John 15:8-9: “And when he [the Paraclete] is come, he will convince the world of sin, and of justice, and of judgment. Of sin indeed: because they have not believed in me.”

John 18:37:“For this was I born, and for this came I into the world, that I should give testimony to the truth: every one who is of the truth, heareth my voice.”

This dogma is, of course, reiterated by countless statements from Popes and councils and 2000 years of Catholic Tradition. To say that one who wishes to be saved can be saved without believing in Jesus Christ is heresy of the worst kind.

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439, ex cathedra: “Sixthly, we offer to the envoys that compendious rule of the faith composed by most blessed Athanasius, which is as follows:

“Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.– But the Catholic faith is this, that we worship one God in the Trinity, and the Trinity in unity... Therefore let him who wishes to be saved, think thus concerning the Trinity.

“But it is necessary for eternal salvation that he faithfully believe also in the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ... the Son of God is God and man... – This is the Catholic faith; unless each one believes this faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.”

It is a fact that Antipope John Paul II has declared that the Old Covenant is still valid for the Jews (and therefore that they can be saved without believing in Christ).

Antipope John Paul II, Address to Jews in West Germany, Nov. 17. 1980: “The first dimension of this dialogue, that is, the meeting between the people of the Old Covenant, never revoked by God, and that of the New Covenant, is at the same time within our Church...”

This heresy is reiterated in Antipope John Paul II's New Catechism, a catechism which Antipope John Paul II promulgated by his “apostolic authority,” which is to say that if Antipope John Paul II were the valid Pope, his new Catechism (and the following heresy on the Old Covenant) were promulgated from the Chair of Peter.

Antipope John Paul II, New Catechism of the Catholic Church, # 121: “... for the Old Covenant has never been revoked...”

Antipope John Paul II has, furthermore, confirmed his heresy on the Jews by his deeds on many occasions. He has been to the Jewish Synagogue where he prayed with them for the coming of the Messiah. Most recently, on Feb. 13, 2003, Antipope John Paul II met with the new chief Rabbi of Rome, and congratulated him for his office!

Antipope John Paul II, Address to Chief Rabbi in Rome, Feb. 13, 2003: “Esteemed Chief Rabbi of Rome, Dear Brothers in the faith of Abraham, I am glad to meet you, esteemed Dr. Riccardo Di Segni, after your election as Chief Rabbi of Rome, and I cordially greet you and the representatives who have accompanied you. I renew my congratulations to you for the important office which has been entrusted to you, and on this important occasion, I would like to recall with deep esteem your illustrious predecessor, Prof. Elio Toaff.” (L'Osservatore Romano, Feb. 19, 2003 issue, p. 6.)

To congratulate the Christ-denying Rabbi for his ascension to the Office of Chief Rabbi involves denying the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation; 2) denying the necessity of believing in Jesus Christ for salvation; and 3) denying the dogma that the Old Covenant has been revoked and cannot be observed without sin.

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Cantate Domino, 1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives...”

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Cantate Domino, 1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic Law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to divine worship at that time, after our Lord's coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of the law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally. Yet it does not deny that after the passion of Christ up to the promulgation of the Gospel they could have been observed until they were believed to be in no way necessary for salvation; but after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts that they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation. All, therefore, who after that time (the promulgation of the Gospel) observe circumcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors.”

In fact, it is a formal denial of three articles of divine and Catholic faith, not to mention the entire Gospel, as shown already. It is a denial of the solemnly defined dogma that 1) the Old Covenant is no longer valid (Pope Eugene IV, ex cathedra); 2) whoever wishes to be saved must believe in the Incarnation for salvation (Athanasian Creed, ex cathedra); and 3) Jews cannot be saved without entering the Catholic Church (Pope Eugene IV, “Cantate Domino,” ex cathedra).

The Protestant would laugh right in their faces and say, “then your false faith is truly not Christian, as it doesn’t even require you to believe that Jesus is necessary for salvation! You Catholics are truly Christ-deniers, just as I believed all along.”

Or what is perhaps more illustrative of the significance of this issue, imagine someone before the Judgment Seat of Jesus Christ and trying to explain to Him:

“Lord, the Vatican said that Jews did not need to believe in You and I told everyone that the Vatican wasn't repudiating the Faith.”

The Outrageous Teaching on the Schismatics


So it is a fact (proven below) that Antipope John Paul II and his false Church reject the dogma of the Catholic faith: that Christian unity with the Schismatics is only achieved by their conversion to Catholicism.

Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (#10), Jan. 6, 1928:

“... the union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it.”

Antipope John Paul II, Homily, Jan. 25, 1993:

“The way to achieve Christian unity, in fact,’ says the document of the Pontifical Commission for Russia, ‘IS NOT PROSELYTISM [trying to convert them] but fraternal dialogue...”

It is therefore a fact that Antipope John Paul II teaches that the faith of Rome (the Catholic faith) is not to be held by non-Catholics (thereby formally repudiating the necessity of belief in the Papacy for salvation and the necessity of the Catholic faith for salvation); therefore, he cannot be looked upon as holding the true Catholic Faith.

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 13), June 29, 1896:

“You are not to be looked upon as holding the true Catholic faith if you do not teach that the faith of Rome is to be held.”

Those who assert, in the face of these facts, that Antipope John Paul II is to be looked upon as holding the true Catholic faith (in other words, that he is their Catholic Pope) are denying this teaching of the Catholic Church and they are asserting that one can be a Catholic while rejecting the necessity of belief in the Papacy (a solemnly defined dogma).

In fact, in his encyclical on Sts. Cyril and Methodius (#27), Antipope John Paul II again indicated that Eastern Schismatics should not be converted to the Catholic Church. He stated that unity with the Schismatics quote ‘is neither absorption nor fusion,’ which means not by conversion. This section of his encyclical was even referenced by the Vatican’s Balamand Statement with the Eastern Schismatics to prove that the Schismatics do not need to be converted!

Additionally, on October 12, 2002, Antipope John Paul II and the Schismatic Patriarch of Romania jointly denounced trying to convert each other. They stated: “Our aim and our ardent desire is full communion, which is not absorption...” In his address on the same day, Antipope John Paul II told the schismatic Patriarch: “The goal is... to reach a unity which implies neither absorption nor fusion...” Need I say more? In the same address to the Schismatic Patriarch of Romania, Antipope John Paul II made this incredible statement:

“For her part, the Catholic Church recognizes the mission which the Orthodox Churches are called to carry out in the countries where they have been rooted for centuries. She desires nothing else than to help this mission...”

“The Second Vatican Council has declared that the Orthodox Church is our Sister Church and has the same means for salvation. So there is no reason to have a policy of proselytism.” (quoted in The Devil's Final Battle, pp. 91-92)

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 13), June 29, 1896:

“You are not to be looked upon as holding the true Catholic faith if you do not teach that the faith of Rome is to be held.”

It is also interesting to consider what Pope Pius IX declared about the “Old Catholics,” a heretical sect that believes in all the teachings of the Catholic Church except the First Vatican Council and its definition of Papal Infallibility.

Pope Pius IX, Graves ac diuturnae (#'s 1-4), March 23, 1875: "... the new heretics who call themselves 'Old Catholics'... these schismatics and heretics... their wicked sect... these sons of darkness... their wicked faction... this deplorable sect... This sect overthrows the foundations of the Catholic religion, shamelessly rejects the dogmatic definitions of the Ecumenical Vatican Council, and devotes itself to the ruin of souls in so many ways. We have decreed and declared in Our letter of 21 November 1873 that those unfortunate men who belong to, adhere to, and support that sect should be considered as schismatics and separated from communion with the Church."

Pope Pius IX solemnly declared that Catholics must regard those as schismatics and separated from the Church who belong to, adhere to and support the sect of the “Old Catholics.” And he says this despite the fact that he also says this:

Pope Pius IX, Graves ac diuturnae (# 2): “They [the ‘Old Catholics’] repeatedly state openly that they do not in the least reject the Catholic Church and its visible head but rather that they are zealous for the purity of Catholic doctrine... But in fact they refuse to acknowledge all the divine prerogatives of the vicar of Christ on earth and do not submit to His supreme Magisterium.”

This proves that we must consider as schismatics and heretics individuals who reject Catholic dogma, even though those individuals claim to be Catholic and have not been specifically excommunicated by name. And this of course applies precisely to Antipope John Paul II and his bishops. But by making the assertions that they do, the authors of is equivalent to indicating that those who belong to, adhere to and support the sect of the “Old Catholics” are not to be considered as schismatics, but Catholics.

This proves what I stated above. I would like to close this section on Antipope John Paul II and the Vatican II sect’s outrageous teaching on the schismatics with some additional Catholic Magisterial teaching on the subject of converting the Eastern Schismatics to the Catholic faith.

Pope Benedict XIV, Allatae Sunt, July 26, 1755:

“First, the missionary who is attempting with God’s help to bring back Greek and eastern schismatics to unity should devote all his effort to the single-objective of delivering them from doctrines at variance with the Catholic faith.”

Pope Benedict XIV, Allatae Sunt, July 26, 1755:

For the only work entrusted to the missionary is that of recalling the Oriental to the Catholic faith...

In addition, the “Neo-Catholic” is one who accepts or defends false ecumenism (i.e., the Vatican II sect's practice of praying with and respecting non-Christian religions of Satan). The “Neo-Catholic” is one who basically accepts, defends or attempts to justify, in one way or another, the entire Vatican II program of heresy and apostasy. The “Neo-Catholic” is someone who may defend kissing the Koran; he may agree with the Joint Declaration with the Lutherans on Justification which repudiates the Council of Trent and teaches Justification by faith alone; the “Neo-Catholic” may defend the idea that Jews don’t need to convert to Jesus Christ for salvation; and he may agree with the Vatican that the Schismatic Orthodox should not believe in the Papacy.

It “does not entitle us to question their orthodoxy”
–“any more than neo-Catholics are entitled to question the Catholic bona fides of traditionalists”! They are both true Catholics and to question the orthodoxy of the “Neo-Catholic” would be equivalent to questioning the Catholic bona fides of traditionalists! Needless to say, such an assertion is a denial of the Catholic faith. And it should be obvious that such a statement is a denial of the faith, for the reasons already discussed in this article; for the Vatican II apostasy – which the “Neo-Catholics” accept and defend – involves the repudiation of the most basic dogmas in Catholicism: such as the necessity of the Papacy for salvation; the necessity of belief in Our Lord; and outside the Church there is no salvation.

Pope St. Leo the Great, Sermon 129:

“Wherefore, since outside the Catholic Church there is nothing perfect, nothing undefiled... we are in no way likened with those who are divided from the unity of the Body of Christ; we are joined in no communion.”

The Pointlessness of the False Resistance

In fact, writing in the June 30, 2003 edition of The Remnant, Thomas Woods comments on a man named John Pacheco, a “Neo-Catholic” who brings forward “a ceaseless supply of excuses and contrived explanations” for the Vatican II apostasy. And what does Mr. Woods have to say about this “Neo-Catholic” defender of apostasy, John Pacheco?

Thomas Woods, “Defending the Indefensible,” The Remnant, June 30, 2003, p. 20: “John Pacheco is a man of good will; of that I am not in doubt...”

It is ironic that Mr. Woods has no doubt that an obstinate defender of heresy and apostasy is of good will, while the Catholic Church teaches that such persons – without any doubt – will perish forever unless they get the Catholic faith.

Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos (# 13), Aug. 15, 1832: “They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that ‘those who are not with Christ are against Him,’ (Lk. 11:23) and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore, without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate” (Athanasian Creed).

Mother Angelica's Network EWTN is the leading broadcaster of Antipope John Paul II's apostate message in the world today. It actively promotes and defends his inter-religious gatherings with Satan's false religions of the world. The notorious apostate Mother Angelica even referred to non-Christian religions as “great religions” in a prayer that she prayed on EWTN. In one program with the apostate priest Fr. Benedict Groeschel, who pointed out that after “Cardinal” John O Connor's death, the Jews held a religious service at St. Patrick's Cathedral, Mother Angelica said “that’s awesome!” Mother Angelica's EWTN is also an adamant defender of the heresies of the Second Vatican Council, even carrying a program on Vatican II called “Council of Faith.” EWTN also carries and actively promotes a show called The Journey Home, a show which features converts to Vatican II Church of Antipope John Paul II. While the program not infrequently contains some very interesting and valuable information, almost every “convert” that The Journey Home features indicates in the discussion that members of the Protestant religion from which he or she just converted are going to heaven too. This proves that EWTN, in addition to the converts to the Vatican II sect, and even their “apologists” trying to convert others to the Vatican II sect, all deny the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation in radical and blunt fashion, just like Antipope John Paul II and his bishops.

St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, II, 30:

“... for men are not bound, or able to read hearts; BUT WHEN THEY SEE THAT SOMEONE IS A HERETIC BY HIS EXTERNAL WORKS, THEY JUDGE HIM TO BE A HERETIC PURE AND SIMPLE, AND CONDEMN HIM AS A HERETIC.”

Vatican II Contains No Error?

This is completely heretical. According to the above, none of the following Vatican II heresies are explicit doctrinal errors:

Christ is united with each man (Gaudium et Spes, 22)
Protestant religions are a means of salvation (Unitatis Redintegratio, 3)
Non-Catholics may lawfully receive Holy Communion (Orientalium ecclesiarum, 27)
Muslims and Catholics together worship God (Lumen Gentium, 16)
The Catholic Church is united with those who don't accept the faith or the Papacy (Lumen Gentium, 15)
The College of Bishops is the subject of full and supreme power over the universal Church (Lumen Gentium, 22)
Some people above the age of reason don't believe in God (i.e., are atheists) through no fault of their own (Lumen Gentium, 16)
The State exceeds its authority if it directs or prevents religious activity (Dignitatis Humanae, 3)
In Buddhism men reach the highest illumination (Nostra Aetate, 2)
All things on earth should be related to man as their center and crown (Gaudium et Spes, 12)

Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis Christi (# 66), June 29, 1943:

“Certainly the loving Mother [the Church] is spotless in the Sacraments, by which she gives birth to and nourishes her children; in the faith which she has always preserved inviolate; in her sacred laws imposed upon all...”
Site Tools
Christian Search:

Google

Verse of the Day

Bible Search


 
Choose your language: