|
|
|
|
| |
In The Beginning
|
| They have pierced my hands and my feet, they have numbered all my bones. Our Lord stands humbly before those of the world mocked, made to be a complete fool. Then put to death for the sake of righteousness. Sudden death can strike at anytime or other bad things could happen to any of us. If you seek to serve Him you must die daily. Forget the people and things of this world. Don't look back when you carry your cross that may require your life. A number of articles and information is shown from a handful of other traditional catholic websites. Many sites linked may have incorrect information but that is up to you if you want to verify with adequate sources what is true or not. I believe what I firmly say in any of my sites is true wherever I get it from. I cannot verify it all also. I am usually referring to issues about the new order catholic church and its false leaders and other issues. |
| Conspiracy World Reformed Online The Highway/charismatic Ihsv.com STRC.OrgNovus Ordo Watch Theholymass.com You cannot accept the revised sacraments of anti-pope John XXIII and Bugnini. You must follow Trent and deviations from it are not licit nor valid since the intention is not there. One of the elements missing nullifies a sacrament. Martin V and Eugene IV spoke fallibly regarding heretics and schismatics that give out valid sacraments. They and the Council of Trent never intended for non-sedevacantists false trads or heretical outfits that are sedevacantists to give out illicit and or invalid sacraments. They are not called by the Church. The Thuc line and the Mendez line must be rejected as heretical and illicit though intentions may be there these men never abjured are excommunicated and can do nothing within the true Church. If there is doubt for any of the sedevacantists sacraments or ordinations you cannot accept them either. We believe there is no chapel to go to or place to receive sacraments anymore. I agree with Richard Ibranyi and a few others on this. You can have externals from sedevacantists outfits but the internal and the divine are not there. Baptism is the only sacrament that can be confected. Christ forgives hopefully through these heretic and apostate clergy in a confession. Extreme Unction by the sedevacantists may not do any good. We hope God will have mercy on these souls and on our souls. We few take the position of St. Athanasius that there the Church exists only in a remnant (people). Not buildings, homes, organizations nor anything else. The SSPX also uses the phony 1962 holy orders for its ordinations. On February 28, 1962 the rite of holy orders was changed by John XXIII and his freemason comrade Bugnini, so it means that an ordained priest is not a true priest or it is doubtful. Compare the ritual and words of holy orders to the decree of Trent. But even if form and matter may seem proper what about the intention (substance)... They use other orders and "sacraments" according to Vatican II and the novus ordo. So that tells you if you accept their phony rites, phony bishops, phony priests and "sacraments" you will go to hell. I do not support financially any sedevacantist or non-sedevacantist outfits. I merely use their sites and materials that I agree with. I tell you not to support any of them financially in any way if they are heretics. Discern by prayer to the Holy Ghost what is good and what isn't when you use other sites and publications by any of them. Many of the sites or publications I may link to or mention are all or mostly heretics, apostates and will contain errors in some of the pages while there is much I agree with. You must discern once again which washes my hands of others being lead the down the wrong path of belief by any traditional website or publication by any of these sedevacantists or those who are so dishonest the non-sedevacantists and false trads. If I find that I at one time linked to a conservative novus ordo site because something was shown that was correct or to point out something for your knowledge I will remove it if I believe it may lead you to a conclusion you can donate or follow these apostates and heretics of the novus or any so called traditional catholic who is more of a liar or dishonest on issues of faith. I refer you to always research and seek truth from other sources though I may not link to them anymore due to the heretical positions they take. The majority of sede vacante also on some doctrines and dogmas are heretics and apostates as are all the anti-sedevacantists who are in partial or full "communion" with the beast New Rome so the false trads and them based on church dogma are heretics and schismatics. |
| The Mass has been taken away from us and I believe we should not cite canon law or epikeia to make what is invalid into what is valid. We can live without the Mass but not the faith. I believe you can only use canon law or other reasons to justify only for baptism, extreme unction and confession. The Mass must be prayed alone, not with these heretics who have no true authority in the traditional chapels. No not one is valid in that I mean they are not turning the host into the Body of Christ. They are doubtful sacraments or like all the Society of St. Pius X chapels who offer a 1962 Mass of John XXIII which are INVALID, HERETICAL AND SCHISMATIC. All non-sedevacantist clergy are manifest heretics and you cannot go to them for Mass. I would not be able to send you anywhere for one reason or an other and for issues of faith and morals. You must fulfill the Sunday obligation some way which can never truly take the place of the Mass since it is the highest form of prayer. You cannot attend an indult under pain of mortal sin. Is the consecration valid or is the Mass licit anywhere? The Church cannot supply jurisdiction to heretics. Firstly, never attend a new ordo even if your life depended on it even during the week, funerals, weddings, events..., you may lose your soul for it. Most new order catholics will lose heaven due to this mortal sin. You cannot be saved in the novus ordo which is a man made church. Sanctify Sunday, keep holy the Sabbath, sanctify yourselves when you cannot get to a Mass for Sunday. Pray the fifteen decades of the Rosary and meditate on the mysteries instead of doing five decades. Don't eat that day or fast, offer up any acts of charity, poverty, or do some acts of corporal or spiritual works of mercy if you cannot get to a Sunday Mass. Some may mortify their flesh in that I say not to whip yourself but to for example not take a painkiller if you have a bad headache. Let it go away on its own during the day. Pray perhaps an extra hour of adoration in a chapel that is open on Sunday. Close off all temporal and worldly things that day unless you have babies and small children that need attention. Buy a Missal one that will probably be a reprint of the 1955 Missal but use it and pray it on Sunday, but use it and pray it on Sunday. You may never as a layperson offer the Mass even if you know Latin in your house or privately unless you are an ordained catholic priest in the Tridentine Rite. I say this only if you do not attend a Mass because it is impossible to attend. Graces come to those who sacrifice and suffer instead. Since the other options cannot truly fulfill to the level the Mass I do advise that you attempt to get to the Mass if at all possible. The days are getting closer that you will no longer have valid traditional priests to celebrate Mass, bless items, give you rites or sacraments. They (hell-heretics) shall not prevail against the Church even if three or even one in the world remain faithful to the hidden Church. I urge you to go and download the audio files on sedevacantism at traditionalcatholicsermons.org, sedevacantist.com and cmri.com. To defend heretics is to be a heretic. Mr. Sungenis because he is a well known expert in the faith would even be more of a brown nosing Vatican II sect lover. Kiss JP II's dirt butt Mr. Sungenis. I will take off where John Lane left off. Silly argument Number 12 to your futile rebuttals of the sedevacantist position. Now for Sungenis and the John Lane debate, I will call Mr. Sungenis a dirtball for the Vatican II sect, who is a liar with a nose 20 times the size of Pinocchio. He is a deceiver and a manifest heretic. You should only attend the novus ordo Mr. Sungenis. No you are not a son of the Catholic Church. I am correcting the moderator on this. I notice you and a handful of other websites show up with the same argument that came out in April 2007 Catholic Family News that Lagrange quoted or reasoned Billuart (De Verbo Incarnato). No where does Garrigou-Lagrange indicate your argument or the SSPX's laughable argument that the Pope and the hierarchy can lead the Roman Catholic Church if they are heretics. Divine law cuts off heretics and apostates by supreme authority. Jurisdiction no longer remains or never can be with heretics, schismatics or apostates in the Holy Church. In no way can the heretic and his heresies co-exist with valid authority and jurisdiction in the Holy See, local diocese or in any instance inside the Mystical Body of Christ (the Church). For where Christ the Head of the Church is that is where His few faithful are today. Heaven has taken over to run the Catholic Church since the death of Pius XII. You cannot be truthful if you attempt to defend the anti-popes of the conciliar novus church. SSPX priests are mostly a bunch of manifest heretics, liars and are not even validly ordained. Their ordinations being done by Lefebvre and the bishops he consecrated are null and void. Mr. Lefebvre was never a valid priest nor a valid bishop. Since the notorious non-catholic Lienart a high level freemason and infiltrator of the Church could in no way possess licit jurisdiction since he is not a member of the Church. It does not suffice to say Lienart was ordained and consecrated in the Tridentine Rite. It is not valid by divine law, so that canon law has no effect in the holy institution whereby no grace can be given to those separated from Christ. If eight popes declared modernists, liberals and freemasons are not in the Church then by what authority do they have to ordain, consecrate, bless or celebrate a Mass? No they are cut off and lack the priestly powers and the powers of a bishop or Pope if they are freemasons and modernists. St. Pius X has condemned them as the enemies of the Church. Lefebvre never had any jurisdiction. Even if a bishop or one who claims to have the powers of a bishop is a heretic such as Lienart. Mr. Lefebvre cannot claim to have original or supplied jurisdiction of his own. He did claim he had authority and he could not even cite the principle of epikeia because he never intended to do what the Church does. He believed you could be outside the Church and be saved. He was a flip flop dirty dog in doctrine and dogma. Not even valid rites and sacraments in the external form can make valid what is declared null and void by Holy Mother Church. Ecclesiastical law even specified by true Popes will not make licit what is not licit and never was and never will be. For those who think they can cite epikeia and Canon Law which is not infallible you need to wake the hell up and that includes all the sedevacantists who think they can attend invalid or illicit Masses, obtain sacraments from heretics and schismatics and lead many into hell. SSPX and the non-sedevacantist lead the way to hell and I call them the mini branch of the Novus Ordo Vatican II Church since they claim to be in communion with apostates and heretics like their "Pope" Benedict. You hypocrites, you tell people not to go to the adulterous indult nor any sedevacantist chapel. Who the HELL do you think you are SSPX? You're a bunch of pigs. So I may call John Paul II a pig and the novus ordo bishops of the world but so are you. Hell is waiting for you too. If you attend the chapels at SSPX you are consuming a piece of bread. They were not sent by the church nor do they have any jurisdiction or authority. First they are in communion or claim to be in communion with apostate Rome and if not they are a schismatic organization under 501C. You cannot want to be attached to present Rome and call yourself Catholic. I have read hundreds of pages of the sedevacantist argument from many of the experts and they cannot be refuted. Perhaps Father Gruner also and his deceptions will end. Wake the hell up you heretics! Your not in the Catholic Church. Benedict the anti-pope and the Vatican II sect will never consecrate Russia. They want the schismatic Russian Orthodox to stay where they are. |
| We do all in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. Enter into the Sacred Heart of Jesus, by His grace alone. The Scandals and Heresies of John XXIII John XXIII (Angelo Roncalli) The Man who called Vatican II and claimed to be Pope from 1958-1963 Angelo Roncalli was born in 1881 and held diplomatic posts in Bulgaria, Turkey and France. Roncalli was also “Patriarch” of Venice. SOME OF JOHN XXIII'S ACTIVITIES BEFORE HIS “ELECTION” AS "POPE" IN 1958 For years the Holy Office had maintained a dossier on Angelo Roncalli (John XXIII) which read "suspected of Modernism." The file dated back to 1925, when Roncalli, who was known for his unorthodox teachings, was abruptly removed from his Professorship at the Lateran Seminary in mid-semester (he was accused of modernism) and shipped off to Bulgaria. This transfer to Bulgaria began his diplomatic career. Of particular concern to Rome was Roncalli's continuing, close association with the defrocked priest, Ernesto Buonaiuti, who was excommunicated for heresy in 1926.(1) As early as 1926, Angelo Roncalli (John XXIII) wrote to one Orthodox Schismatic: "Catholics and Orthodox are not enemies, but brothers. We have the same faith; we share the same sacraments, and especially the Eucharist. We are divided by some disagreements concerning the divine constitution of the Church of Jesus Christ. The persons who were the cause of these disagreements have been dead for centuries. Let us abandon the old disputes and, each in his own domain, let us work to make our brothers good, by giving them good example. Later on, though traveling along different paths, we shall achieve union among the churches to form together the true and unique Church of our Lord Jesus Christ."(2) This statement means that the one true Church has not yet been established. In 1935, Angelo Roncalli arrived in Turkey and became friends with the Under Secretary of the Foreign Office, Naman Rifat Menemengioglu.(3) One time Menemengioglu said to Roncalli: “The secularity of the State is our fundamental principle and the guarantee of our liberty.” Roncalli responded: “The Church will be careful not to infringe your liberty.”(4) While in Turkey, Roncalli also stated: “You Irish are impossible. The moment you come into the world, even before you are baptized, you begin damning everybody who doesn’t belong to the Church, especially Protestants!”(5) “The extreme anti-Catholic faction of the Greek Orthodox Church gleefully announced an agreement with the Church of England by which each recognized the validity of the other’s Holy Orders. But Roncalli was genuinely pleased. To the Greeks who slyly asked him what he thought of the arrangement, he said sincerely, ‘I have nothing but praise for our separated brothers for their zeal in taking a step toward the union of all Christians.’”(6) Desmond O' Grady, former Vatican correspondent for the Washington Post, reported that while stationed in Istanbul in 1944 Roncalli “gave a sermon on a council to be held in the postwar period.”(7) While Roncalli (later John XXIII) was Nuncio to France, he was appointed Observer for the Holy See to the United Nations cultural agency, UNESCO. In July 1951 he gave a speech “lavishly praising UNESCO...”(8) Roncalli called UNESCO “this great international organization...”(9) When Angelo Roncalli was the nuncio to France he appointed a thirty-third degree Freemason and close friend, the Baron Yves Marsaudon, as head of the French branch of the Knights of Malta, a Catholic lay order.(10) Yves Marsaudon, the French freemason and author, also claims that Roncalli became a thirty-third degree Mason while a nuncio at France. Mary Ball Martinez wrote that the French Republican Guards from their posts observed: “...the Nuncio [Roncalli] in civilian clothes leaving his residence to attend the Thursday evening meetings of the Grand Orient of France. Whereas exposure to such a dramatic conflict of loyalties would unnerve the average man, be he Catholic or Freemason, Angelo Roncalli seems to have taken it in his stride.”(11) The Magazine 30 Days also held an interview several years ago with the head of the Italian Freemasons. The Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy stated: “As for that, it seems that John XXIII was initiated (into a Masonic Lodge) in Paris and participated in the work of the Istanbul Workshops.”(12) One time in Paris “Msgr.” Roncalli once attended a banquet and was seated next to a woman who was dressed in a very immodest low-cut gown. The company with Roncalli felt slightly ill at ease. The guests shot looks at the “Papal Nuncio.” Roncalli broke the silence by stating with humor: ”I can't imagine why all the guests keep looking at me, a poor old sinner, when my neighbor, our charming hostess, is so much younger and more attractive.”(13) When John XXIII was later “elevated” to the College of Cardinals, he insisted upon receiving the red hat from the atheist and notoriously anti-clerical socialist(14) Vincent Auriol, President of the country of France(15) (whom he had described as "an honest socialist"). Roncalli knelt before Auriol and Auriol placed the Cardinal's biretta on Roncalli's head. Auriol then hung a “broad red ribbon around the Cardinal's neck embracing him on each cheek with a little bear-hug that imparted personal warmth to formal protocol.”(16) Auriol had to wipe away his tears with a handkerchief when Roncalli left to assume his new dignity as “Cardinal.”(17) At social functions in Paris, Roncalli (John XXIII) was frequently seen socializing with the Soviet ambassador, M. Bogomolov, even though Bogomolov's government had resumed its pre-war policy of brutal extermination of Catholics in Russia. He was also known as a "good friend and confidant" of Edouard Herriot, Secretary of the Anti-Catholic Radical Socialists (of France).(18) “Perhaps Roncalli’s greatest friend was the grand old socialist and anti-clerical, Edouard Herriot.”(19) Before Roncalli left Paris he gave a farewell dinner for his friends. “The guests included politicians on the Right, the Left, and the Center united on this one occasion in their affection for their genial host.”(20) When Roncalli was “Cardinal” of Venice he “offered the Communists no grounds on which to criticize him. Habitual anti-clerical insults gave way to respectful silence.”(21) While in Venice, “Cardinal” Roncalli “exhorted the faithful to welcome the Socialists of all Italy, who were holding their thirty-second party” in Venice.(22) “The Patriarch (John XXIII) had notices placed on the walls all over Venice for the opening of the thirty-second Congress of the Socialist Party of Italy (PSI) in February, 1957. They read as follows: ‘I welcome the exceptional significance of this event, which is so important for the future of our country. I should like to believe that the decisive motive for your assembly is to understand contemporary conditions and to devote yourselves to doing everything possible to improve living conditions and social well-being.’”(23) Pope Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno #120, May 15, 1931: “No one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true socialist.”(24) Roncalli once spoke at the Venice town hall. He stated: “... I am happy to be here, even though there may be some present who do not call themselves Christians, but who can be acknowledged as such because of their good deeds.”(25) JOHN XXIII'S ACTIVITIES AND STATEMENTS AFTER HIS ELECTION AS “POPE” IN 1958 Shortly after being “elected” and moving into the Vatican, “John XXIII found an ancient statue of Hippolytus, an antipope of the Third Century. He had the statue restored and placed at the entrance of the Vatican Library.”(26) “Disappointed faces appeared everywhere in St. Peter's Square when John XXIII began his first papal blessing, for he hardly raised his arms. His sign of the cross seemed to the Romans a pitiful gesture, for he appeared to be moving his wrist at about hip level.”(27) “John XXIII pronounced himself embarrassed at being addressed as 'Holiness' or 'Holy Father'...”(28) “For a long time John XXIII said 'I' instead of ‘we’ in his official talks. Popes are expected to use ‘we’ and ‘us’ at least on official occasions.”(29) When John XXIII published an encyclical on penance it proclaimed no fast nor even any obligatory day of abstinence from food or secular pleasures.(30) John XXIII said of himself: “I'm the Pope who keeps stepping on the accelerator.”(31) John XXIII’s father was a winegrower. Speaking of his father, John XXIII said: ”There are only three ways a man can be ruined: women, gambling, and ... farming. My father chose the most boring of the three.”(32) In this statement John XXIII seems to be saying that ruining oneself with gambling or women is exciting. JOHN XXIII ON HERETICS, SCHISMATICS AND NON-CATHOLICS John XXIII described what he thought the Second Vatican Council’s attitude toward the non-Catholic sects should be with these words: “We do not intend to conduct a trial of the past. We do not want to prove who was right or who was wrong. All we want to say is, ‘Let us come together; let us make an end of our divisions.’”(33) His instructions to “Cardinal” Bea, head of the Council’s Secretariat for the Union of Christians, were, “We must leave aside, for the moment, those elements on which we differ.”(34) One time a “Congressman suddenly blurted out: ‘I’m a Baptist.’ Smiling John XXIII said, ‘Well, I’m John.’”(35) John XXIII said to the non-Catholic Roger Schultz, founder of the ecumenical community at Taize (a Protestant monastery): "You are in the Church, be at peace." Schultz exclaimed: "But then, we are Catholics!" John XXIII said: "Yes; we are no longer separated."(36) Pope Vigilius, Second Council of Constantinople, 553: "Our teaching is and has been all that they have defined concerning the one faith. We consider those who do not accept these things as foreign to the Catholic Church. Furthermore, we condemn and anathematize, along with all other heretics who have been condemned and anathematized by the same four holy councils and by the holy, Catholic, and apostolic Church..."(37) John XXIII received at the Vatican the first “Archbishop” of Canterbury, the first “prelate” of the U.S. Episcopal Church, and the first Shinto high priest.(38) John XXIII once remarked: “If I were born a Muslim, I believe that I would have always stayed a good Muslim, faithful to my religion.”(39) One of John XXIII's first acts was to receive the Muslim Shah of Iran in audience. When the Shah of Iran was about to leave “John XXIII gave him his benediction which he had rephrased delicately to avoid offending the Mohammedan’s religious principles: ‘May the most abundant favor of Almighty God be with you.’”(40) By rephrasing the blessing, John XXIII 1) removed the Most Holy Trinity who is invoked in the blessing so that he wouldn’t offend the unbeliever; and 2) he gave a blessing to a member of a false religion. On July 18, 1959, John XXIII suppressed the following prayer: "Be Thou King of all those who are still involved in the darkness of idolatry or Islam."(41) In his Apostolic Brief on October 17, 1925, Pope Pius XI ordered that this prayer be publicly recited on the feast of Christ the King.(42) John XXIII removed from the Calendar of Saints the Fourteen Holy Helpers and a number of other Saints, including St. Philomena.(43) Under Pope Gregory XVI, the Sacred Congregation of Rites gave a full and favorable decision in favor of the cult of St. Philomena; in addition, Pope Gregory XVI gave Saint Philomena the titles of: "Great Wonder Worker of the 19th century" and "Patroness of the Living Rosary."(44) She was canonized by the same Pope in 1837. A Canonization of a saint is "a public and official declaration of the heroic virtue of a person and the inclusion of his or her name in the canon (roll or register) of the saints... This judgment of the Church is infallible and irreformable."(45) John XXIII stated: “...whoever shouts is unjust! We must always respect the dignity of man standing before us, and above all the freedom of every man.”(46) John XXIII wanted the clergy of “Orthodox” Churches of Russia (many of whom were KGB agents) to participate at Vatican II. The “Orthodox” said that some of their clergy would attend provided that there was no condemnation of Communism at Vatican II. John XXIII promised the schismatics – in exchange for their participation at Vatican II – that there would not be any condemnation of Communism at Vatican II.(47) That's some deal, isn’t it! John XXIII saw where the non-Catholic observers at Vatican II were going to be seated and stated: “That won’t do! Put our separated brothers close to me.” As one pleased Anglican put it: “So, there we were – bang in the front row.”(48) On October 11, 1962 John XXIII gave his opening Speech to the Council: “They say that our era, in comparison with past eras, is getting worse, and they behave as though at the time of former Councils everything was a full triumph for the Christian idea and life and for proper religious liberty. We feel we must disagree with those prophets of gloom, who are always forecasting disaster, as though the end of the world were at hand. In the present order of things, Divine Providence is leading us to a new order of human relations...” “...errors vanish as quickly as they arise, like fog before the sun. The Church has always opposed these errors. Frequently she has condemned them with the greatest severity. Nowadays, however, the Spouse of Christ prefers to make use of the medicine of mercy rather than that of severity. She (the Church) considers that she meets the needs of the present day by demonstrating the validity of her teaching rather than by condemnations. ...Unfortunately, the entire Christian family has not yet fully attained this visible unity in truth.”(49) In his opening speech at Vatican II, John XXIII states that the Church has historically opposed and condemned errors, but now his Church is not going to issue any condemnations. He also utters the heresy that the “entire Christian family has not yet fully attained this visible unity in truth.” First, the “entire Christian family” is only made up of Catholics. To say that the “entire Christian family” includes non-Catholics, as John XXIII does above, is heresy. Second, John XXIII says the Christian family (which is the Catholic Church) “has not yet fully attained this visible unity in truth.” This is heresy. It is a clear-cut denial of the unity of the true Church of Christ, the Catholic Church. The true Church (the Catholic Church) is one in faith; and the Catholic Church has already attained and will always maintain a “visible unity in truth.” Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 4), June 29, 1896: "The Church in respect of its unity belongs to the category of things indivisible by nature, though heretics try to divide it into many parts." Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 4): "Furthermore, the eminence of the Church arises from its unity, as the principle of its constitution - a unity surpassing all else, and having nothing like unto it or equal to it." Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 5): "'There is one God, and one Christ; and His Church is one and the faith is one; and one people, joined together in the solid unity of the body in the bond of concord. This unity cannot be broken, nor the one body divided by the separation of its constituent parts.'" John XXIII changed the rubrics for the Breviary and Missal.(50) He ordered the suppression of the Leonine Prayers, the prayers prescribed by Pope Leo XIII to be recited after Mass. These prayers were also prescribed by Pope St. Pius X and Pope Pius XI.(51) This included the Prayer to St. Michael the Archangel, a prayer that specifically makes mention of the battle that the Church wages against the devil. He removed the Psalm Judica me from the Mass.(52) John XXIII then suppressed the Last Gospel, the Gospel of St. John. This Gospel is also used in exorcisms.(53) Next, John XXIII eliminated the second Confiteor in the Mass – that which is said immediately before the Communion of the priest. Only after all these changes did he introduce a change into the Canon of the Mass by inserting the name of St. Joseph.(54) The request to have St. Joseph’s name placed in the canon was officially rejected by Pope Pius VII on September 16, 1815 (55) and Pope Leo XIII on August 15, 1892.(56) The other major changes regarding the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass came into effect the first Sunday in Advent, 1964.(57) JOHN XXIII ON SOCIALISM AND COMMUNISM John XXIII wrote a letter praising Marc Sangnier, the founder of the Sillon. The Sillon was an organization which was condemned by Pope Pius X. John XXIII wrote about Sangnier: “The powerful fascination of his (Sangnier’s) words, of his soul, had thrilled me, and the liveliest memories of my entire priestly youth are for his person and his political and social activity...”(58) In John XXIII's encyclical Mater et Magistra (on Christianity and social progress), he promotes socialist ideals and does not condemn contraception or Communism even once. Being asked why he would reply to the greeting of a Communist dictator, John XXIII answered: "I am Pope John, not because of any personal merit, but because of an act of God, and God is in every one of us."(59) “John enjoyed himself thoroughly with the Communists; one might have thought they were his own brothers.”(60) Communism was condemned 35 times by Pope Pius XI and 123 times by Pope Pius XII.(61) On March 6, 1963 John XXIII received Aleksei Adzhubei and his wife Rada in a special audience. Rada was Premier Khrushchev's daughter. Rada (Khrushchev’s daughter) spoke about her meeting with John XXIII: “...he handed Aleksei and me a pair of symbolic gifts, which were intended for my father, too and he said: ‘...That’s for your Papa.’”(62) Nikita Khrushchev, the Communist Soviet Premier said, “We applaud the taking of positions of Pope John XXIII in favor of peace.”(63) On the occasion of his eightieth birthday (Nov. 25, 1961), John XXIII received a telegram from Khrushchev offering his “congratulations and sincere wishes for good health and success in his noble aspirations to contribute to ... peace on earth.”(64) General Secretary of the British Communist Party, John Gollan, before television cameras on April 21, said the “encyclical (Pacem in Terris) [of John XXIII] had surprised and gladdened” him and, therefore, he had externalized his “most sincere satisfaction at the recent 28th Party Congress.”(65) One of John XXIII's good friends was the Communist and Lenin Peace Prize winner Giacomo Manzu.(66) John XXIII said: “I see no reason why a Christian could not vote for a Marxist if he finds the latter to be more fit to follow such a political line and historical destiny.”(67) The Catholic Church has condemned Communism on more than 200 occasions.(68) JOHN XXIII PRAISED BY FREEMASONS AND COMMUNISTS DURING HIS “PONTIFICATE” John XXIII, Pacem in terris #14, April 11, 1963: “Also among man’s rights is that of being able to worship God in accordance with the right dictates of his own conscience, and to profess his religion both in private and in public.” This is heresy. It is not man’s right to worship false gods in public. This has been condemned by many Popes. When the theologian of the Holy Office, Fr. Ciappi, told John XXIII that his encyclical Pacem in Terris contradicted the teaching of Popes Gregory XVI and Pius IX on religious liberty, John XXIII responded: “I won’t be offended by a few spots if most of it shines.” (68a) John XXIII's encyclical Pacem in Terris was praised by Masonic leaders themselves as a Masonic document. Here are just a few examples: Below is quoted an article taken from the Masonic Bulletin, official organ of the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Masons, for the Masonic District of the United States of Mexico, located at 56 Lucerna St., Mexico, D.F. (Year 18, No. 220, May 1963). THE LIGHT OF THE GREAT ARCHITECT OF THE UNIVERSE ENLIGHTENS THE VATICAN “Generally speaking, the encyclical Pacem in Terris, addressed to all men of goodwill, has inspired comfort and hope. Both in democratic and Communist countries it has been universally praised. Only the Catholic dictatorships have frowned upon it and distorted its spirit. “To us many concepts and doctrines it contains are familiar. We have heard them from illustrious rationalist, liberal, and socialist brothers. After having carefully weighed the meaning of each word, we might say that, the proverbial and typical Vatican literary rubbish notwithstanding, the encyclical Pacem in Terris is a vigorous statement of Masonic doctrine...we do not hesitate to recommend its thoughtful reading.”(69) In the book Resurgence du Temple, published and edited by the Knights Templar (Freemasons), 1975:149, the following quote is of interest: “The direction of our action: Continuation of the Work of John XXIII and all those who have followed him on the way to Templar Universalism.”(70) JOHN XXIII AND THE JEWS John XXIII also did things like stopping his car so that he could bless Jews leaving their "Sabbath" worship.(71) John XXIII once greeted some Jewish visitors with the words, "I am Joseph, your brother."(72) Just before his death, John XXIII composed the following prayer for the Jews. This prayer was confirmed by the Vatican as being the work of John XXIII.(73) "We realize today how blind we have been throughout the centuries and how we did not appreciate the beauty of the Chosen People nor the features of our favored brothers. We are aware of the divine mark of Cain placed upon our forehead. In the course of centuries our brother, Abel, has been lying bleeding and in tears on the ground through our fault, only because we had forgotten thy love. Forgive us our unjustified condemnation of the Jews. Forgive us that by crucifying them we have crucified You for the second time. Forgive us. We did not know what we were doing."(74) John XXIII says here that the Jews are still the chosen people, which is heretical. The phrase "perfidious Jews" was the expression used by Catholics in the Good Friday Liturgy until John XXIII removed it in 1960.(75) The word perfidious means unfaithful.(76) “On Good Friday, 1963, the Cardinal who was the celebrant in St. Peter’s said the old words (perfidious Jews) from force of habit. John XXIII stunned the worshippers by stopping him in midstream with the words, ‘Say it over the new way.’”(77) Pope Benedict XIV, A Quo Primum, June 14, 1751: "Another threat to Christians has been the influence of Jewish faithlessness... Surely it is not in vain that the Church has established the universal prayer which is offered up for the faithless Jews from the rising of the sun to its setting, that they may be rescued from their darkness into the light of truth."(78) To a recently baptized Jewish boy, John XXIII said: “By becoming a Catholic you do not become less a Jew.”(78a) On the night of John XXIII's death, the Chief Rabbi of Rome and other leaders of the Jewish community gathered with hundreds of thousands in Saint Peter's Square to mourn.(79) Alden Hatch, author of A Man Named John, The Life of John XXIII, stated about John XXIII: “...surely none (previous Popes) had so touched the hearts of people of all faiths – and of no faith. For they knew he loved them no matter what they were or what they believed.”(80) THE DEATH OF JOHN XXIII After his death, the Vatican sent for Gennar Goglia, who with his colleagues embalmed John XXIII. Goglia injected ten liters of embalming fluid into John XXIII’s wrist and stomach to neutralize any putrefaction.(81) This is why John XXIII's body did not decompose like normal bodies. When John XXIII was originally buried, he was buried in a wood coffin.(82) In January 2001 John XXIII’s body was exhumed and placed in a new bullet-proof crystal coffin now on display in St. Peter's basilica. John XXIII's face and hands were also covered in wax.(83) STATEMENTS FROM FREEMASONS, COMMUNISTS AND NON-CATHOLICS PRAISING JOHN XXIII AFTER HIS DEATH After the death of John XXIII, numerous documents from Communists, Masons, and Jews were sent to the Vatican expressing their sorrow for the death of John XXIII. Persons like “Fidel Castro and Nikita Khrushchev sent messages of praise and sorrow.”(84) From the June 4, 1963, edition of The Reporter (El Informador); “The Great Western Mexican Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons, on the occasion of the death of John XXIII, makes known its sorrow for the disappearance of this great man who revolutionized the ideas, thoughts, and forms of the Roman Catholic liturgy. His encyclicals Mater et Magistra and Pacem in Terris have revolutionized the concepts favoring human rights and liberty. Mankind has lost a great man, and we Masons acknowledge his high principles, his humanitarianism, and his being a great liberal. Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico, June 3, 1963 Dr. Jose Guadalupe Zuno Hernandez (85)” Charles Riandey, a sovereign Grand Master of secret societies, in his preface to a book by Yves Marsaudon (State Minister of the Supreme Council of French secret societies), stated: "To the memory of Angelo Roncalli, priest, Archbishop of Messamaris, Apostolic Nuncio in Paris, Cardinal of the Roman Church, Patriarch of Venice, Pope under the name of John XXIII, who has deigned to give us his benediction, his understanding, and his protection."(86) A second preface to the book was addressed to “his august continuer, His Holiness Pope Paul VI.”(87) The high ranking Freemason, Carl Jacob Burckhardt, wrote in the Journal de Geneve: “I know Cardinal Roncalli very well. He was a Deist and a Rationalist whose strength did not lie in the ability to believe in miracles and to venerate the sacred.”(88) A HERETIC CANNOT BE A VALID POPE The Catholic Church teaches that a heretic cannot be validly elected Pope, since a heretic is not a member of the Catholic Church. The facts in this article prove that John XXIII, the man who called Vatican II and began the apostate Conciliar Church, was clearly a heretic. He was not a valid Pope. Pope Paul IV, Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Feb. 15, 1559: “6. In addition, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity We enact, determine, decree and define:-] that if ever at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless; (ii) it shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through possession of administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or Veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any period of time in the foregoing situation; (iii) it shall not be held as partially legitimate in any way... (vi) those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration, of all dignity, position, honor, title, authority, office and power.... 10. No one at all, therefore, may infringe this document of our approbation, re-introduction, sanction, statute and derogation of wills and decrees, or by rash presumption contradict it. If anyone, however, should presume to attempt this, let him know that he is destined to incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles, Peter and Paul. Given in Rome at Saint Peter's in the year of the Incarnation of the Lord 1559, 15th February, in the fourth year of our Pontificate. + I, Paul, Bishop of the Catholic Church...” St. Robert Bellarmine: “A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically (per se) ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the teaching of all the ancient Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction.” (De Romano Pontifice, II, 30) Angelo Roncalli (John XXIII) was an Antipope. THE AMAZING PARALLELS BETWEEN ANTIPOPE JOHN XXIII OF THE GREAT WESTERN SCHISM AND ANTIPOPE JOHN XXIII OF VATICAN II The name “John” had been avoided by Popes for five hundred years because the last man to have it was the notorious Antipope John XXIII (Baldassare Cossa) of the Great Western Schism. The parallels between the first Antipope John XXIII (Baldassare Cossa) and the second are striking: The reign of the first Antipope John XXIII spanned five years, from 1410 to 1415, just like the reign of the recent Antipope John XXIII, which spanned five years, from 1958 to 1963. The first Antipope John XXIII called a phony council, the Council of Constance. (The Council of Constance later became a true ecumenical council, with certain sessions approved by the true Pope; but at the time that Antipope John XXIII opened it, it was a false council.) Likewise, the recent Antipope John XXIII (Angelo Roncalli) also called a false council, Vatican Council II! The first Antipope John XXIII opened his false council at Constance in the 4th year of his reign, 1414. The recent Antipope John XXIII opened Vatican II in the 4th year of his reign, 1962. The first Antipope John XXIII died shortly before the 3rd Session of his false Council, in 1415. The recent Antipope John XXIII died shortly before the 3rd Session of Vatican II, in 1963. We believe that the similarities between the first Antipope John XXIII and the second are not merely coincidences. The first Antipope John XXIII was also the last Antipope to reign from Rome. Was Angelo Roncalli, the recent Antipope John XXIII, by taking that name, indicating symbolically that he is continuing in the line of Antipopes to reign from Rome? Cardinal Heenan, who was present at the 1958 conclave which gave us John XXIII, once mentioned: "There was no great mystery about Pope John's election. He was chosen because he was a very old man. His chief duty was to make Msgr. Montini (later Paul VI), the Archbishop of Milan, a cardinal so that he could be elected in the next conclave. That was the policy and it was carried out precisely."(89) ENDNOTES (1) Lawrence Elliott, I Will Be Called John, 1973, pp. 90-92. (2) Luigi Accattoli, When A Pope Asks Forgiveness, New York: Alba House and Daughters of St. Paul, 1998, pp. 18-19. (3) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 93. (4) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 94. (5) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 96. (6) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 98. (7) St. Anthony’s Messenger, Nov. 1996. (8) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 117. (9) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 118. (10) Paul I. Murphy and R. Rene Arlington, La Popessa, 1983, pp. 332-333. (11) Mary Ball Martinez, The Underminding of the Catholic Church, p. 117. (12) Giovanni Cubeddu, 30 Days, Issue No. 2-1994., p. 25. (13) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1964, p. 90. (14) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 121. (15) The Making of the Pope, London, England: A. S. Barnes and Company, 1962, p. 127. (16) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 123. (17) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1964, p .99. (18) Rev. Francis Murphy, John XXIII Comes To The Vatican, 1959, p. 139. (19) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 114. (20) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 125. (21) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1964, p. 104. (22) Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 159. (23) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1964, p. 105. (24) Claudia Carlen Ihm, The Papal Encylicals, The Pierian Press, Vol. 4, p. 434. (25) Peter Hebblethwaite, John XXIII, The Pope of the Council, Doubleday, ed. Le Centurion, 1988, p. 271. (26) Paul Johnson, Pope John XXIII, p. 37, 114-115, 130. (27) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964, p. 24. (28) Time Magazine, 1962 Man of the Year: Pope John XXIII (internet version) at www.catholic.net/RCC/News/Time Mag/1962.html. p. 7. (from Jan. 4, 1963 issue). (29) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1964, p. 49. 30. Romano Amerio, Iota Unum, 1998. Angelus Press, 2918 Tracy Ave. Kansas City, Mo., p. 241 (31) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1964, p. 134. (32) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964, p. 110. (33) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 192. (34) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 192. (35) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 194. (36) Luigi Accattoli, When A Pope Asks Forgiveness, p. 19. (37) Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Sheed and Ward and Georgetown Univ. Press, 1990, Vol. 1, p. 113. (38) Time Magazine, 1962 Man of the Year: Pope John XXIII (internet version) at www.catholic.net/RCC/News/Time Mag/1962.html. p. 7. (from Jan. 4, 1963 issue). (39) Allegri, Il Papa che ha cambiato il mondo, ed., Reverdito, 1998, p. 120. Also in Sacerdotium, Issue #11, 2899 East Big Beaver Rd. Suite 308 Troy, MI.) p. 58 (40) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 193. (41) Luigi Accattoli, When A Pope Asks Forgiveness, p. 20. (42) Fr. F.X. Lasance, My Prayer Book, 1938 ed., p. 520a. (43) The Reign of Mary, "A Final Concern," Spring, 1986, p. 11. (44) Fr. Paul O'Sullivan, O.P., Saint Philomena, The Wonder Worker, Rockford, IL: TAN Books, 1993, pp. 69-70. (45) A Catholic Dictionary, edited by Donald Attwater, TAN Books, 1997, p. 72. (46) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1964, p. 135. (47) Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 180. (48) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 14. (49) Walter Abbott, The Documents of Vatican II, pp. 712; 716; 717. (50) The Papal Encyclicals, by Claudia Carlen, Raleigh: The Pierian Press, 1990, Vol. 5 (1958-1981), p. 5. (51) The Reign of Mary, Spring, 1986, p. 10. (52) An Open Letter to Confused "Traditionalists," p. 5. (53) The Reign of Mary, Vol. XXIX, No. 93, p. 16. (54) The Reign of Mary, Vol. XXIX, No. 93, p. 16. (55) The Reign of Mary, Vol. XXII, No. 64, p. 8. (56) The Reign of Mary, Spring, 1986, pp. 9-10. (57) Ursula Oxfort, The Heresy of John XXIII, p. 27. (58) Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, Pope John XXIII, Mission to France, 1944-1953, pp. 124-125. (59) The Reign of Mary, Spring, 1986, Spokane, WA: CMRI, p. 9. (60) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1964, p .57. (61) Piers Compton, The Broken Cross, Cranbrook, Western Australia: Veritas Pub. Co. Ptd Ltd, 1984, p. 45. (62) Kurt Klinger, A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII, NY,NY., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1964, p. 24. (63) Fr. Des Anges, Fatima: Intimate Joy, Vol. IV, p. 67. (64) Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 177. also in Piers Compton, The Broken Cross, Cranbrook, Western Australia: Veritas Pub. Co. Ptd Ltd, 1984, p. 44. (65) Ibid., p. 170 (66) Curtis Bill Pepper, An Artist and the Pope, London, England: Grosset and Dunlap, Inc. also look at p. 5. (67) Fr. Joaquin Arriaga, The New Montinian Church (Brea, Ca.), p. 570 (68) Michael Davies, Pope John’s Council, 1992. Angelus Press, 2918 Tracy Ave. Kansas City, Mo., p. 150 (68a) Catholic Restoration, March-April 1992, Madison Heights, MI, p. 29. (69) Fr. Joaquin Arriaga, The New Montinian Church (Brea, Ca.), pp. 147-148 (70) A.D.O. Datus, “Ab Initio,” p. 60. (71) George Weigel, Witness to Hope, New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc., 1999, p. 484. (72) Bart McDowell, Inside the Vatican, Washington D.C.: National Geographic Society, 1991, p. 193. Also can be seen in Time Magazine Jan 4, 1963 issue in the man of the year article p. 6 in internet version. (73) The Reign of Mary, "John XXIII and the Jews," Spring, 1986, p. 11. (74) B'nai B'rith Messenger, Friday, November 4, 1964. (75) Luigi Accattoli, When A Pope Asks Forgiveness, p. 15. (76) The Oxford Illustrated Dictionary, Second Edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985, p. 627. (77) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 192. (78) The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 1 (1740-1878), pp. 41-42. (78a) Catholic Restoration, May-June 1993, Madison Heights, MI, p. 24. (79) Darcy O' Brien, The Hidden Pope, New York, NY: Daybreak Books, 1998, p. 10. (80) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, after p. 238 (1st page of insert) (81) Wendy Reardon, The Deaths of the Popes, Jefferson, NC., McFarland and Co., Inc,2004, p. 244. (82) Wendy Reardon, The Deaths of the Popes, Jefferson, NC., McFarland and Co., Inc,2004, p. 244. (83) Wendy Reardon, The Deaths of the Popes, Jefferson, NC., McFarland and Co., Inc,2004, p. 244. (84) Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, NY, NY. Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, after p. 238 (7th page of insert) (85) Fr. Joaquin Arriaga, p.147 (86) Piers Compton, The Broken Cross, Cranbrook, Western Australia: Veritas Pub. Co. Ptd Ltd, 1984, p. 50. (87) Piers Compton, The Broken Cross, Cranbrook, Western Australia: Veritas Pub. Co. Ptd Ltd, 1984, p. 50. (88) A.D.O Datus, “AB INITIO” p. 60 (89) Cardinal Heenan's biography, Crown of Thorns. |
| I have taken an argument of why John Paul II cannot be the Pope. I have reformatted it and its text will be in light blue background in order. These can be bought on cassettes, video and dvd at Most Holy Family Monastery along with many other traditional catholic materials. Why John Paul II was not the Pope – a Comprehensive Presentation Jesus Christ Founded the Church Upon St. Peter In the 16th chapter of St. Matthew's Gospel, we read the following. And Jesus said to Peter: "Thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven." It is an indisputable fact of Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition that Jesus Christ made Peter the visible head of His Church. Christ gave the supreme authority to Peter and Peter's successors as Popes to rule the universal Church of God, to invoke their supreme authority when necessary to teach infallibly on doctrinal issues, and to regulate the Catholic Church's laws and worship. There Have Been Antipopes But, as many of you know, throughout the 2,000 year history of the Catholic Church, there have been some Antipopes, that is to say, men who claimed to hold the authority of Pope, yet who were not canonically elected as head of Christ's Church. Some Antipopes were installed by Anti-Catholic Emperors who had taken the true Pope into exile and implanted their own man. Others were elected fraudulently after the true Pope had already been chosen. One of the most notorious cases in Church history was that of the Antipope Anacletus II, who reigned in Rome from 1130 to 1138. Anacletus had been implanted in an uncanonical election after Innocent II, the true Pope, had already been chosen. Despite his invalid and uncanonical election, Antipope Anacletus II gained control of Rome and the support of the majority of the College of Cardinals. Anacletus held the support of almost the entire populace of Rome until the true Pope regained control of the city in 1138. It is not our goal in this article to deal in depth with the cases of Antipopes in Church history. It should suffice to say that in the history of the Church there have been many different cases of Antipopes, cases that have encompassed a wide variety of circumstances. An entire article could be dedicated to investigating the history surrounding many of these Antipopes' reigns, since there have been over 40 Antipopes in the history of the Catholic Church. We simply want to note at the beginning of this article that Antipopes (that is to say, false successors of Peter) have existed, who have deceived a significant part of the Catholic world, and even posed as the true Pope while reigning from Rome itself. This fact proves that it is not impossible that an Antipope is reigning from Rome right now, an Antipope posing to the world as the true Pope, while in fact being the Church's bitter enemy. The New Religion Since Vatican II As many of you know, and as we have documented on our video Vatican II: Council of Apostasy, the incredible changes that have taken place in the Catholic world as a result of the Second Vatican Council, have been a complete break with Traditional Roman Catholicism. It is simply a fact that Vatican II and the religion it produced were contrary to the unchangeable teaching of the Roman Catholic Church. In the video Vatican II: Council of Apostasy, we proved that the two men who instigated the Vatican II apostasy and revolution – John XXIII and Paul VI – were not legitimate Popes, but actually non-Catholic Antipopes. In this article we will shine the spotlight on the man who has perpetuated the Vatican II apostasy to levels that far exceed that of John XXIII and Paul VI. We will shine the spotlight on John Paul II, arguably the greatest heretic in the history of the world, and we will prove that he is not and cannot be the real Pope of the Catholic Church. The Teaching of the Catholic Church on Heresy To understand why John Paul II cannot be the Pope, one must understand heresy and apostasy. Heresy is the obstinate denial or doubt by a baptized person of an article of divine and Catholic Faith. In other words, a baptized person who deliberately denies an authoritative teaching of the Catholic Church is a heretic. Pope Leo XIII proclaims this teaching in his encyclical Satis Cognitum. Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9), June 29, 1896: "The practice of the Church has always been the same, as is shown by the unanimous teaching of the Fathers, who were wont to hold as outside Catholic communion, and alien to the Church, whoever would recede in the least degree from any point of doctrine proposed by her authoritative Magisterium."(1) Apostasy, on the other hand, is not merely the denial or doubt of one or more teachings of the Catholic Church, but a complete rejection of the Christian Faith altogether. In this video we will show that John Paul II is both a heretic and an apostate. As the teaching of Pope Leo XIII shows, a heretic is outside Catholic communion and alien to the Church. The same therefore goes for apostates, since all apostates are also heretics. The fact that a heretic is outside the Catholic Church is a defined dogma affirmed by many Popes. A heretic cannot be inside the Catholic Church, because by denying the faith he is automatically expelled from Her. Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, ex cathedra: "The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics ..."(2) We see here that Pope Eugene IV defined infallibly that all heretics are outside the Catholic Church. Pope Innocent III, Eius exemplo, Dec. 18, 1208: "By the heart we believe and by the mouth we confess the one Church, not of heretics, but the Holy Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Church outside of which we believe that no one is saved."(3) We see in this solemn profession of faith of Pope Innocent III that the one true Church of Christ cannot include heretics. In fact, so foreign are heretics to the Catholic Church that the Catholic Church has actually defined that heretics are the gates of hell. Pope Vigilius, Second Council of Constantinople, 553: "... we bear in mind what was promised about the holy Church and Him who said the gates of hell will not prevail against it (by these we understand the death-dealing tongues of heretics,..."(4) Pope St. Leo IX, Sept. 2, 1053: "The holy Church built upon a rock, that is Christ, and upon Peter... because by the gates of Hell, that is, by the disputations of heretics which lead the vain to destruction, it would never be overcome."(5) Thus, it is infallible Catholic truth that a heretic cannot be a member of the Catholic Church. Many other authorities could be brought forward to further prove this point, but we will simply quote Pope Leo XIII again, who summarizes this dogmatic teaching of the Church quite well. Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9): "No one who merely disbelieves in all (these heresies) can for that reason regard himself as a Catholic or call himself one. For there may be or may arise some other heresies, which are not set out in this work of ours, and, if any one holds to a single one of these he is not a Catholic."(6) And because a heretic cannot be a Catholic or a member of the Catholic Church, it is a fact that a heretic cannot be a Pope, because a Pope is the head of the Catholic Church. Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Sess. IV, Chap. 3: "... the Pontiff of Rome himself is the successor of the blessed Peter, the chief of the apostles, and is the true vicar of Christ and head of the whole Church..."(7) The Pope is the head of the whole Catholic Church. And we already saw that heretics cannot be members of the Catholic Church. Therefore, it is infallible that a heretic cannot be a Pope, because a heretic cannot be the head of that which he is not a member. This is why the Saints and Doctors of the Church consistently teach that if a Pope were to become a manifest heretic he would immediately lose the office of Pope. St. Antoninus: In the case in which the pope would become a heretic, he would find himself, by that fact alone and without any other sentence, separated from the Church. A head separated from a body cannot, as long as it remains separated, be head of the same body from which it was cut off. A pope who would be separated from the Church by heresy, therefore, would by that very fact itself cease to be head of the Church. He could not be a heretic and remain pope, because, since he is outside of the Church, he cannot possess the keys of the Church. (Summa Theologica, cited in Actes de Vatican I. V. Frond pub.) St. Alphonsus, Bishop and Doctor of the Church: "If ever a Pope, as a private person, should fall into heresy, he would at once fall from the Pontificate." (Oeuvres Completes. 9:232) St. Francis De Sales, Bishop and Doctor of the Church: "Now when the Pope is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church..." (The Catholic Controversy, TAN Books, pp. 305-306) St. Robert Bellarmine, Cardinal and Doctor of the Church: "This principle is most certain. The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope, as Cajetan himself admits. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member; now he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome and others; therefore the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." (De Romano Pontifice, II, 30) The testimonies of these great Catholic saints show that it is impossible for a heretic to be the head of the Catholic Church, because he is not a member of Her. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| Site Tools |
|
|
|
|
|
Verse of the Day |
|
|
